RESULTS
What simulation has delivered elsewhere.
These are published cases from other companies and software providers. Each is a single, self-reported case, mostly without a stated baseline: examples, not guarantees. We will replace them with our own pilot results as soon as we have them.
Published cases
−55 %
Cycle time on drawer slides, for example 40 s down to 18 s.
Source: Moldex3D customer case, WISE [2]
8 → 2
Mold trials. Reworks 5 to 1, warpage −40 to −45 %, total cost −52 %.
Source: Moldex3D customer case, GoHope [5]
−92 %
Z-warpage on a tablet base cover. Scrap −13 %.
Source: Moldex3D customer case, Pegatron [6]
$48,000
Saved per year with a 6 % shorter cycle.
Source: Autodesk partner case, Superior Tool & Mold [3]
50 %
Of molds needed no rework after simulation.
Source: MoldMaking Technology, Plas-Pak, 2008 [4]
20 → 1
Shots for process development on 3D-printed tooling (10 to 20 shots down to 1).
Source: Moldex3D customer case [7]
Sources
All figures are self-reported single cases from the sources below. They show what is possible, not what every project achieves.
Our own results are coming.
We will publish our pilot cases here, with each customer’s permission. Want to be one of them? Let’s talk.